Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 02:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 36.3
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 105
36% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 208
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.2
2% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 10 5.7 15 146 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 299
Write 233
Mixed 240
SusWrite 77.4
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 7.4
35% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 57.3
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 43.4
40% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD44G240081S 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MZGLKDP-00 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback