Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20NQS2W400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20NQS2W400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NQS2W400
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191205
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 07:51
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8665U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 110
51% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 280
29% 232 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 2294) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.6
8% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L5B0B 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80750C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 92 90 94 90 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 383
Write 459
Mixed 474
SusWrite 95.1
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 30.8
109% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 355
265% 351 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 183%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 42GB
14GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 26 25 24 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
Read 511
Write 93
Mixed 282
SusWrite 26.3
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 8.6
56% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 133
86% 101 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback