Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 22:36
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 212
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 638
63% 513 Pts
64-Core 864
54% 864 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.6% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 93.2
89% 100 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 63.4
73% 94.3 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 479GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 125 75 64 111 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 377
Write 166
Mixed 121
SusWrite 90.3
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94.9
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 25
38% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 162%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
353GB free
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 39 58 63 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 91.2
Write 60.6
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 54.5
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 28.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback