ADD TO PC
BUILD

Compaq-presario BK422AA-ACJ CQ3258IL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Compaq-presario BK422AA-ACJ CQ3258IL (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100303
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 01:46
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 66.1 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 107 51% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 179 23% 176 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.88% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 0.2 3% 2.83 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 0 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.88% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.03E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 54 49 51 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 48.8 Write 44.3 Mixed 37 SusWrite 51.9 34% 45.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 58%
CT3500SC 500GB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 448GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 131 133 133 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 129 Write 132 Mixed 73 SusWrite 132 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AD80AD80 HMT351U6EFR8C-PB AD80BE80 HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.2 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback