Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B940
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 72.7
41% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 92.7
8-Core 92.5
12% 92.6 Pts
64-Core 98.1
6% 98.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C597) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 196 232 188 165 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 371
Write 379
Mixed 333
SusWrite 210
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 28.9
92% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 40.9
34% 48 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 124%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
26GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 10 9.7 9.7 9.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 30
Write 11
Mixed 14
SusWrite 11.6
20% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
70% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD32G13332S 04CB AD73I1C1674EV 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV420/RV520/RV720/E3530/S3530/E3420/E3520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback