Today's hottest deals

Asus X550CA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CA
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 72.5
32% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 52.8
8-Core 57
7% 54.9 Pts
64-Core 62.4
4% 62.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0617A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 108 122 121 95 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 264
Write 126
Mixed 149
SusWrite 106
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 8.1
19% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 8.8
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550CA Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback