Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-72 481 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Memory 33.5 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 37.7 21% 31.5 Pts	4-Core 19.2 8-Core 24.1 3% 21.7 Pts	64-Core 17.6 1% 17.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gateway(107B 0700) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 0.6 Gravity 16.7 Splatting 0.5 4% 5.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 130 106 128 104 98 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 131 Write 146 Mixed 103 SusWrite 114 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 8.1 31% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 55.7 DQ Mixed 28.9 25% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 0.3 3% 1.03 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM