Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 03:39
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$42
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G645 @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 153
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 148
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1601ABYS-01C0A0 165GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 06.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 56 53 50 35 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 69.7
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 49
45% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 44%
Generic External 160GB
20GB free, PID 1240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 25.3
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 18.8
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 20%
Generic External 160GB
138GB free, PID 1240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 24.5
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 19
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback