Dell Precision 7820 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision 7820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0804P1
Memory86.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 12:03
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 5118
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 155
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 563
52% 435 Pts
64-Core 1,323
82% 1,323 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 37.5
29% 38 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 38
Splatting 25.4
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM981a SAMS 2TB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 716 652 595 553 539 601 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 2,224
Write 1,036
Mixed 873
SusWrite 609
261% 1,185 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 34.6
153% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 203
190% 305 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 188%
Great: 360%
Nvme PC601 SK hy 1TB
936GB free
Firmware: 2111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 519 506 486 458 521 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 911
Write 741
Mixed 409
SusWrite 512
144% 643 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 14.1
61% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 250%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$292
849GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 660 609 556 526 513 566 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,761
Write 691
Mixed 666
SusWrite 572
203% 922 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 14.5
93% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 22.6
DQ Mixed 89.4
121% 237 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 146%
Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6J1 6x16GB
6 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 49.9
MC Mixed 44.6
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 9.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7820 Tower Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Dell Precision 7820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback