Today's hottest deals

Positivo C14CU51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPositivo C14CU51  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo C14CU51
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 22:16
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 83.3
46% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 80.5
8-Core 78.7
11% 79.6 Pts
64-Core 83
5% 83 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1297 2032) 811MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 73 65 77 72 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 76.1
Write 83.7
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 69.9
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564568FJ8NZRNSDR 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C14CU51 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CU51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback