| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3047h |
| Memory | 0.4 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110802 |
| Uptime | 101.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 04 '21 at 03:50 |
| Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Sempron 150
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
38%
Below average
|
35% 46.2 Pts
|
4% 29.6 Pts
|
2% 29.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
|
0.92%
Terrible
|
1% 0.93 fps
|
1% 0.83 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$47
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 15 16 16 16 MB/s
|
6.64%
Terrible
|
10% 13 MB/s
|
32% 0.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 35GB
1333, 0 MHz
2048, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
10.3%
Very poor
|
7% 2.4 GB/s
|
11% 3.9 GB/s
|
40% 98.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 271 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples | 54x |
| Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples | 45x |
| Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples | 150x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 7x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 7x |
| Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples | 6x |
| A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $25 |