Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 190 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 171 60% 105 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 661 59% 499 Pts	64-Core 2555 158% 2555 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 40 Parallax 37.9 30% 38.3 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 26.9 27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Cs900 SSD 240GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0200Sf10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 174 65 63 63 65 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41% Average	Read 198 Write 96.5 Mixed 110 SusWrite 111 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 19.8 68% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 84.3 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 149 104% 126 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 2x16GB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	MC Read 44.2 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 28.8 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.8 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16