Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 17:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 171
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 661
59% 499 Pts
64-Core 2555
158% 2555 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 40
Parallax 37.9
30% 38.3 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 26.9
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cs900 SSD 240GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Sf10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 174 65 63 63 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 198
Write 96.5
Mixed 110
SusWrite 111
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 19.8
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 84.3
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 149
104% 126 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 41%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.8
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback