Today's hottest deals

ECS A68M-C4DL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS A68M-C4DL  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150630
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 06 '21 at 21:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 84.8
43% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 160
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3103) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 19.4
17% 20.4 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 11.8
11% 14 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 182 188 181 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 191
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 180
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3320813AS 320GB
95GB free
Firmware: HP22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 83.7
Write 84.2
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 88.7
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GE7MFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68M-C4DL Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A68M-C4DL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback