Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 07:37
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 295
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 872
89% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.4% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 77.7
37% 60.6 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 43
41% 51.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
780GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 586 388 337 363 353 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 2517
Write 917
Mixed 1,158
SusWrite 393
273% 1,246 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 26.3
138% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 66.4
DQ Mixed 95.9
166% 350 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 186%
Great: 372%
Intel 330 Series 240GB
176GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 136 136 137 132 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 441
Write 116
Mixed 181
SusWrite 134
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 22
82% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 75.1
64% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 46 46 47 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
834GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 133 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 130
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 132
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 Kingston 9905678-138.A00G CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 Kingston 9905678-042.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.7% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 29.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 27.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $754
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback