Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3000/3080

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro 3000/3080  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR 3664h
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100401
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 16:44
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 31.3
2-Core 34.2
31% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 74.1
8-Core 46.3
9% 60.2 Pts
64-Core 12.2
1% 12.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3664)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.33 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.28%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160212SCE 160GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ACF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.2 4.3 5.4 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 46.9
Write 9.4
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 6.5
14% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.7
4% 1.53 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3000/3080 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3000/3080

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback