Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 214 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 41.2 1-Core 36 2-Core 71.5 30% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 366 31% 266 Pts	64-Core 1,250 77% 1,250 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Dell PERC H710P 600GB 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 58 57 59 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

HP Portable HDD 1TB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 120GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 24.9 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 24.7 30% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT42GR7MFR4A-H9 002C04B3002C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 00AD00B300AD HMT42GR7MFR4A-H9 002C04B3002C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.6% Below average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 2.5 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	11x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro M5000NvidiaBench 50%, 1,540 samples	6x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	5x
SSD 1TBPcieBench 292%, 19,971 samples	2x

RAM
HMT84GL7BMR4C-RD 002C04B3002C 72JSZS4G72L1G9E2A7 00AD04B300AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 00AD063200AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 002C04B3002C 72JSZS4G72L1G9E2A7 00AD04B300AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 191GBUnknownBench 75%, 9 samples	6x
HMT84GL7AMR4A-PB 8x31.9GBHynixBench 43%, 5 samples	4x
HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 4x31.8GBHynixBench 71%, 22 samples	3x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $330