Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 20:22
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 63.3
34% 51.4 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 223
21% 174 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gainward(10B0 0FC6) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.26% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.9 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.26%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 344 374 375 380 325 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 432
Write 373
Mixed 364
SusWrite 362
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 14.3
57% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 38
55% 104 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ17RG4BFWA- 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 17
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 17.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback