Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '21 at 15:43
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 148 54% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 434 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000 1,288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 16.3 Reflection 28.9 Parallax 19.3 13% 21.5 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 14.1 Splatting 21 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 316GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 351 360 348 371 367 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 424 Write 399 Mixed 369 SusWrite 356 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 41.8 135% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 254 211% 305 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 711GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 394 418 385 408 407 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 411 Write 363 Mixed 396 SusWrite 398 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 40.1 129% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 339 256% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 133%
LEXAR DIGITAL FILM 0GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 0080 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.68 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 19% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	145x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	89x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278