Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 21:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$127
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 138
58% 96 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 395
39% 320 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.37.01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 42.8
27% 35 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 27
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1021A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 64 44 30 31 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 478
Write 201
Mixed 285
SusWrite 41.2
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 26.2
86% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 84.9
91% 148 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
358GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 140 139 138 138 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 160
Write 163
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 141
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 2OZ Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 DDR3 1600 2OZ Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback