To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 12:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 76.8
39% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 76.6
8-Core 72.3
10% 74.4 Pts
64-Core 76
5% 76 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Intel(8086 2E32) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.8
1% 1 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtore 120GB 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 194 209 182 137 193 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.1% Average
Read 240
Write 211
Mixed 201
SusWrite 187
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 16
80% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 18.6
24% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 500GB
4GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 26 21 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 28.2
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 25.4
36% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback