Today's hottest deals

HP xw6600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw6600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A9Ch
Memory17.3 GB free of 24.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080505
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5410
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 61.6
30% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 111
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Lighting 13
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 13.2
11% 12.7 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 0.2
6% 8.43 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX300-240 240GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 19 17 18 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.7% Poor
Read 52.9
Write 116
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 45
13% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 13.3
43% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 99.1
DQ Write 46.2
DQ Mixed 16
27% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
994GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 187 187 182 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 122
Write 162
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 187
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
602GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 153 150 149 150 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 164
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 150
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 57GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.6
6% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6600 Workstation Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback