Today's hottest deals

Tarox Basic 5261BM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTarox Basic 5261BM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 20:58
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 369
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Nvidia(10DE 134D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 176
Parallax 115
95% 136 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 101
Splatting 94.5
89% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 64 67 69 69 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 65
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 88%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
167GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 99
Write 98.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 85
61% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%
ASMT 2105 1TB
538GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 162 190 192 192 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 17.5
Write 18.2
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 173
98% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
929GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 113 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 50
Write 110
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 112
120% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Basic 5261BM Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Tarox Basic 5261BM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback