Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 14:32
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,122
99% 843 Pts
64-Core 2,121
131% 2,121 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 37.5
29% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 26.8
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 386 394 402 390 404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 366
Write 396
Mixed 293
SusWrite 386
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 28.5
97% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 58.9
DQ Mixed 74
60% 86 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1768 1771 1788 1805 1661 1528 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,565
Write 1,832
Mixed 1703
SusWrite 1,720
438% 1,955 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 91.8
304% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,315
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 1,213
912% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 357%
Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
218GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 452 448 214 159 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 450
Mixed 393
SusWrite 311
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 57
188% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
68GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 66 64 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 63.3
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 65.6
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
445GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 68 64 68 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 150
Write 134
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 66.2
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 97%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
931GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 68 64 68 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 61.9
Write 66.9
Mixed 34
SusWrite 66
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
558GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 110
Write 119
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 115
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 84%
LaCie d2 quadra 4TB
500GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 22 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 30.4
Mixed 32
SusWrite 21.1
39% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 18%
LaCie d2 quadra 4TB
694GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 39.3
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 21.7
44% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
149% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 38.9
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 35.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $881
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback