Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu ESPRIMO E400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E400  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2990-A1
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111122
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 15:07
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$158
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 468
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 38.4
24% 32.3 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 26.7
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 90 56 73 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 83.3
Write 87.3
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 72.6
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 88%
Adata HV300 2TB
321GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 22.4
Write 23.9
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 27.2
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.2
111% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-023.A00LF 9905584-015.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E400 Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback