Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro N50-610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory104GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 104GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-610
Memory99.5 GB free of 104 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 03:15
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 255
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 704
74% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$147
Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.9% Average
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 47.2
43% 52 fps
MRender 42.3
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 44.8
37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk_quattro--nvmefw -MODE-IDENT_CNTR 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: A0047Q3P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 351 562 561 530 532 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 437
Write 93.3
Mixed 154
SusWrite 438
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 36.4
102% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 359
222% 249 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 134%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 14 14 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 20.6
Write 8.5
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 14.9
20% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
168% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 029E CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 103GB
3200, 2400, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.2% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-610 Builds (Compare 3,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $241
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback