XMG P65xRP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemXMG P65xRP  (all builds)
MotherboardXMG P65xRP
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 14:55
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 515
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6A01) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6229
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6.1
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 6A01) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2037 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 64.1
48% 64.2 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 68.3
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,835
Write 1,192
Mixed 544
261% 1190 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 50
167% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 354
275% 372 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 292%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
61GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 391 387 357 398 416 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 304
Mixed 361
SusWrite 388
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 43.6
143% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 287
216% 286 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
68GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 313 314 310 314 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 457
Write 386
Mixed 408
SusWrite 323
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 42.5
138% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 85.3
93% 147 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4S240FSD.16FBD 859B BLS8G4S240FSD.16FBD 859B BLS8G4S240FSD.16FBD 859B BLS8G4S240FSD.16FBD2 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65xRP Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: XMG P65xRP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback