Today's hottest deals

Google Zako

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Zako  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Zako
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 07:22
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 48.9
31% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 76.9
8-Core 83.4
10% 80.2 Pts
64-Core 92.1
6% 92.1 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1AE0 C000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 5.1
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 256GB 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 291 249 233 232 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 320
Write 304
Mixed 274
SusWrite 255
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 34.8
62% 117 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown (0) None 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zako Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Google Zako

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback