Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 187 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 361 47% 356 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 1,651 User benchmarks, average bench 14% AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1219 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.Q2.2 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 27.5 Parallax 22.6 13% 21.9 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 15.8 Splatting 21.6 17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SUPERSONIC240 240GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0615A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 58 28 111 56 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 454 Write 371 Mixed 312 SusWrite 61.3 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 13.3 4K Mixed 0.6 31% 9.67 MB/s	DQ Read 80.3 DQ Write 46.2 DQ Mixed 0.5 17% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 77%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 223GB free Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 393 415 412 416 419 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 468 Write 421 Mixed 395 SusWrite 411 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 24.7 103% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 47.7 98% 194 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
DDR3 1600 8G 1600 8G 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.1% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 17.8 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 17.6 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,216x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1,005x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	236x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	159x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87