Today's hottest deals

MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory38.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210303
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 01:36
Run Duration345 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 248
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 812
78% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,331
82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.2% Very good
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 105
Parallax 98.7
81% 101 fps
MRender 87
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 92.3
75% 91.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid SanDisk SSD PLUS 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 56 56 59 67 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 348
Write 123
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 56.1
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 9.1
42% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 47.2
DQ Write 25
DQ Mixed 22.3
20% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 44%
Amd-raid CT500P 500GB
223GB free
Firmware: P2CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 104 113 136 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 902
Write 982
Mixed 752
SusWrite 125
154% 690 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 45.3
167% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 186
197% 309 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 112%
Great: 175%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 8.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 107 134 126 123 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 92%
Amd-raid SanDisk S24 240GB
222GB free
Firmware: Z220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 79 81 82 90 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 326
Write 276
Mixed 165
SusWrite 80.1
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 5
20% 6.53 MB/s
DQ Read 45.5
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 50.1
54% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 67%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 200GB
149GB free
Firmware: 8.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 743 687 689 691 479 352 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 90%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
248GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 87 87 100 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 61.8
Write 103
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 88.2
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.1
83% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 107%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 8.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 91.3
Write 92.1
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 73
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 Kingston KHX3000C15/16GX TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 Kingston KHX3000C15/16GX 48GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 35.3
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 32.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $917
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback