Today's hottest deals

Biostar A32M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A32M2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 01:42
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 160
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 251
36% 264 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Biostar(1565 170B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.8 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.7
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$66
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 123 117 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 146
Write 114
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 125
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A32M2 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A32M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback