| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Razer Blade (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Razer CH530 |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190919 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 04 '21 at 22:42 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
|
70.9%
Very good
|
74% 124 Pts
|
35% 236 Pts
|
12% 201 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
|
2.22%
Terrible
|
2% 11.6 fps
|
3% 3.3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.9%
Above average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
60% 21 GB/s
|
64% 62.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,028 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Razer Blade
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 2,061x |
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 1,071x |
| Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples | 469x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 1,447x |
| RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples | 597x |
| GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples | 399x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |