Samsung

M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB

M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
BENCHMARKS (108,106)
MKT (0.2%)
BUILDS
(1)

Effective Speed -18%Effective Speed -18%Average Score -22%MC Read -18%, MC Write -12%, MC Mixed -34%Peak Score -45%MC Read -43%, MC Write -38%, MC Mixed -53%Value & Sentiment +2% User Rating -12%, Market Share 17%Nice To Haves -6%SC Read -20%, SC Write 6%, SC Mixed -12%, SC Read -37%, SC Write -9%, SC Mixed -25%, Latency -6%, Latency -9%, Age 56%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Average Bench: 76.2% (67^th of 115)

Based on 108,106 user benchmarks. Model: Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB

Poor: 57%Average: 76.2% Great: 84%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB averaged 23.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 29.6GB/s

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 29.5GB/s

See where your RAM ranks →

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB is 27.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 16.1GB/s

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 77.9ns

Average Bench

(Based on 108,106 samples)

Rank 6776.2%

Min	Avg	Max
20.1	MC Read 29.6	32.9
19.4	MC Write 29.5	33
17.8	MC Mixed 22.4	26.5
77.6% 27.2 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
8.6	SC Read 16.1	19.6
14	SC Write 29.4	36.4
12.1	SC Mixed 22.6	26.7
64.8% 22.7 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
59.6	Latency 77.9	120
51.3% 77.9 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

DEU-User, 1 hr ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

85.4% Excellent

MC Read 33.1

MC Write 33.4

MC Mixed 24.9

87% 30.5 GB/s

SC Read 17.3

SC Write 32.8

SC Mixed 25.4

72% 25.2 GB/s

Latency 62.5

64% 62.5 ns

USA-User, 9 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

76.6% Very good

MC Read 30.8

MC Write 29.3

MC Mixed 22.7

79% 27.6 GB/s

SC Read 16.2

SC Write 25.2

SC Mixed 23.5

62% 21.6 GB/s

Latency 73.3

55% 73.3 ns

USA-User, 4 hrs ago.

2 of 4 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

74.8% Very good

MC Read 29.1

MC Write 28.4

MC Mixed 20.9

75% 26.1 GB/s

SC Read 16.6

SC Write 31.2

SC Mixed 23.8

68% 23.9 GB/s

Latency 65.9

61% 65.9 ns

MAR-User, 8 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

74.7% Very good

MC Read 29

MC Write 28.7

MC Mixed 20.9

75% 26.2 GB/s

SC Read 16.1

SC Write 31.9

SC Mixed 23.1

68% 23.7 GB/s

Latency 67.9

59% 67.9 ns

PER-User, 8 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

73.7% Very good

MC Read 29.6

MC Write 27.3

MC Mixed 20.8

74% 25.9 GB/s

SC Read 16.3

SC Write 27.9

SC Mixed 22.1

63% 22.1 GB/s

Latency 62.9

64% 62.9 ns

CAN-User, 8 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

72.5% Very good

MC Read 28.3

MC Write 28.1

MC Mixed 20.6

73% 25.7 GB/s

SC Read 15.7

SC Write 29.3

SC Mixed 22.1

64% 22.4 GB/s

Latency 74.6

54% 74.6 ns

USA-User, 7 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

71.7% Very good

MC Read 27.9

MC Write 32.2

MC Mixed 22.6

79% 27.6 GB/s

SC Read 6.9

SC Write 19.9

SC Mixed 12.4

37% 13.1 GB/s

Latency 89.1

45% 89.1 ns

IND-User, 22 mins ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz

69.4% Good

MC Read 28.1

MC Write 25.6

MC Mixed 20.1

70% 24.6 GB/s

SC Read 15.2

SC Write 23.9

SC Mixed 21.6

58% 20.2 GB/s

Latency 68.7

58% 68.7 ns

108,106 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 63,771,937 RAM Kits tested.

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB Builds (Compare 3,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	1,837x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	969x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	433x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,286x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	538x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	360x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	745x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	270x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	231x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,588x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark.
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- See speed test results from other users.
- Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2023 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

Comments

Added n/a ago.

USA-User

level
9,516

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

3 years ago.

Your
opinion?

▲Like ▼Dislike

Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Samsung

M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB

Average Bench: 76.2% (67th of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Razer Blade

Popular M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 76.2% (67^th of 115)