Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 128 2-Core 253 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 646 67% 536 Pts	64-Core 690 43% 690 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 6.1 Reflection 114 Parallax 7.3 5% 42.5 fps	Gravity 6.1 Splatting 12.1 8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB 20,980 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 82 102 91 87 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 840 Write 793 Mixed 776 SusWrite 98.2 140% 627 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 95.8 4K Mixed 0.7 53% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 12.7 DQ Write 56.7 DQ Mixed 345 175% 138 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 203%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 24 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 34.4 SC Mixed 26.7 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	1,301x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,213x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	1,133x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GBKingstonBench 135%, 20,980 samples	945x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1032 512GBWDCBench 194%, 7,562 samples	535x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	363x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	706x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples	431x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	313x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16