Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 170 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 652 58% 490 Pts	64-Core 1,642 102% 1,642 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6171) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80% Excellent	Lighting 100 Reflection 105 Parallax 92.7 82% 99.3 fps	MRender 91.7 Gravity 92.6 Splatting 96.4 77% 93.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 479GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.12 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 78%
Dell PERC H310 2TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2.12 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0... 128GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	MC Read 46.4 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 32.3 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.9 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	96x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	78x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	76x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	35x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	29x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $85