Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory5.9 GB free of 11 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5405
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 52.3
34% 48 Pts
4-Core 95.7
8-Core 98.2
13% 96.9 Pts
64-Core 92.5
6% 92.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 570
Nvidia(10DE 0474) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i Adapter 292GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 152 149 144 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 571
Write 49.9
Mixed 441
SusWrite 144
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 44.4
159% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 141
107% 145 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
855GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.3% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 25.2
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 26
6% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 7
24% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 11GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 512, 512, 512, 512, 512, 512 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback