Asus G752VT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G752VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G752VT
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170406
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 21:12
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 163
55% 100 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 465
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Asus(1043 1CED) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 37.1
31% 38.8 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 32.1
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,379
Write 854
Mixed 669
213% 967 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 46.4
162% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 659
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 469
346% 466 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 243%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
404GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.5
Write 97.6
Mixed 37.5
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 M471A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G752VT Builds (Compare 335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Asus G752VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback