Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 12:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,200
105% 894 Pts
64-Core 2856
177% 2856 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.1% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 111
Parallax 102
84% 106 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 103
Splatting 98.3
81% 98.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1625 1625 1633 1632 1642 1634 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 1,433
Write 1,626
Mixed 1,064
SusWrite 1,632
325% 1,439 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 79.4
270% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 927
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 567
520% 797 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 281%
Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-062.A00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 36.7
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 33.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 I AORUS PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $719
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback