Dell Latitude 5280

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Latitude 5280  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 04T711
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 195
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 282
39% 287 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Dell(1028 07A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.3 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 114 123 123 122 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 447
Write 269
Mixed 304
SusWrite 126
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 33.1
134% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 141
110% 154 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 82%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
931GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 318 421 427 422 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 429
Mixed 397
SusWrite 403
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 64.3
215% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 363
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 80AD000080AD HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude 5280 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 5280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback