Today's hottest deals

Asus M4N68T-M-LE-V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M-LE-V2  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 08:04
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 101
44% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 266
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1189 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 33.3
19% 28.1 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 24.8
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 175 104 69 88 82 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 198
Write 161
Mixed 164
SusWrite 113
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 15
51% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 24.7
DQ Mixed 19.8
16% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 89%
Ct240bx5 0 240GB
102GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 80 29 85 54 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.4% Poor
Read 199
Write 159
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 69.9
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 2.9
26% 7.7 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 22.6
DQ Mixed 13.3
12% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T-M-LE-V2 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M-LE-V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback