PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 MT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3397 |
Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120507 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 11 '21 at 10:58 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
70.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 78 77 78 77 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 135 139 138 137 131 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 173 171 177 181 174 MB/s
|
88%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 232x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 120x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 80x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 102x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 59x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 33x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |