Bytespeed Value H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive5.61% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBytespeed Value H81M-C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-C
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 20:45
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440S-$118
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 179
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 276
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 30.7
27% 32 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 22.3
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS128GE8BBDC 128GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F1000001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 21 19 24 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Read 46
Write 12.5
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 19.5
5% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 4.8
7% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 11%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
72GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 87 97 96 99 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 102
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 95.2
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1200, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Value H81M-C Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Bytespeed Value H81M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback