Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory174.4 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.9 GHz
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime32.2 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 05:50
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 141
58% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 508
46% 390 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 120 119 118 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 108
SusWrite 119
27% 118 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 19.8
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 98.4
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 92.4
69% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
782GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.3 3.6 5.4 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 95%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 5.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.1 2.6 5.8 4.9 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 22TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 3.1 3.8 5.2 5.1 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 150
Write 46.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 4.8
42% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
320GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.1 3.3 8.8 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.2% Terrible
Read 3.8
Write 3.5
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 3.6
10% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
33% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 19%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
705GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.1 2.8 7.5 2.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 2% Great: 19%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 11TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0 2.7 7.6 4.4 2.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59% Above average
Read 203
Write 36.1
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 3.1
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x16GB
12 of 12 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 22.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback