Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 194 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 359 50% 367 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	7.57% Terrible	Lighting 8.9 Reflection 12.2 Parallax 8.1 7% 9.73 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 9.9 Splatting 8.8 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 7.57% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB 9,229 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201219 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 331 335 111 14 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 418 Write 112 Mixed 251 SusWrite 206 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 8.4 82% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 11.3 61% 134 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 166%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 930GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 117 119 118 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 123 Write 92.3 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 116 73% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.8 262% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TD8G16C11-H11 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.6% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.4 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	37x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $435