Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FBC_X712FB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FBC_X712FB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X712FBC
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 19:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 266
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 586
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 15EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 859 875 451 127 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,266
Write 926
Mixed 826
SusWrite 527
198% 886 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 69.5
247% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 271
300% 488 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 186%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.7
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FBC_X712FB Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712FBC_X712FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback