Notebook N15_17RF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook N15_17RF  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N15_17RF
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 22:42
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 526
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M
Clevo(1558 0152) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 34.1
28% 35.7 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 29.8
25% 30.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 138 146 147 147 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 461
Write 153
Mixed 178
SusWrite 146
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 30.2
121% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 181
154% 232 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 112%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 112 109 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 107
Write 90.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 111
60% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 12 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 18.7
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 11
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.5
253% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
DDR3 NB 8G 1600 Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N15_17RF Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Notebook N15_17RF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback