Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '21 at 20:16
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 80.8 1-Core 129 2-Core 267 86% 159 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 592 66% 522 Pts	64-Core 729 45% 729 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 375C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.2% Very good	Lighting 94.4 Reflection 92.4 Parallax 84.4 77% 90.4 fps	MRender 94.6 Gravity 87.3 Splatting 75.2 69% 85.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 81%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c83 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,294 Write 24.5 Mixed 8.5 92% 442 MB/s	4K Read 450 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.1 683% 150 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 124GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 113 Write 116 Mixed 72.9 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer D12.2324CS.001 2x8GB 469 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.8% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 20.8 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 14.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,617x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,217x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	833x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	481x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	429x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	297x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	218x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	361x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	163x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16