Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409MA
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200407
Uptime65.9 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 00:00
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.9% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 75
31% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 52.5
8-Core 29
6% 40.8 Pts
64-Core 74.1
5% 74.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1D91) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8587
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 96 104 94 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 77
Write 80.7
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 92.8
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-058.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 1
3% 1.03 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409MA Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback