MSI B85M ECO (MS-7817)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI B85M ECO (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140630
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 08:15
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 369
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.31
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 52.7
47% 56 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 46.5
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 67 44 68 87 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 83.3
Write 90.1
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 65.1
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
101GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 39 40 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 70.9
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 38.7
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 57%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 134 140 139 139 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 133
Write 135
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 139
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
18GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 114 114 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 66.4
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 98.6
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 66%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
78GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 69 88 99 106 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
44% Average
Read 74.5
Write 65.1
Mixed 51
SusWrite 91.7
96% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
161% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905584-003.A00LF 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 9905584-003.A00LF 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M ECO (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B85M ECO (MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback