Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory31.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.3GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory24.1 GB free of 31.3301 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 17 '21 at 13:20
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 84%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 12-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Memory 7.79
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 84.4
21% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 161
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 49.7
Parallax 75.5
46% 60.6 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 39.5
37% 45.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 373
Write 326
Mixed 364
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 4.3
14% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 77%
Red Hat VirtIO 805GB
516GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 230 244 217 211 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
Read 362
Write 238
Mixed 282
SusWrite 222
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 3.4
13% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15698 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 7.6
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 425
9% 425 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback