Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '21 at 12:48
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 73.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 182 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 438 57% 428 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 2187) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3157 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Lighting 82.7 Reflection 119 Parallax 78.6 67% 93.6 fps	MRender 62.6 Gravity 72.7 Splatting 60.3 53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB 2,993 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.2.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 132 133 118 123 148 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.7% Below average	Read 275 Write 189 Mixed 165 SusWrite 125 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 14.5 42% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 98 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 103 71% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP008GBLFU266B02 1x8GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	31% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 5.9 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 94.1 42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,073x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	933x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	279x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	356x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	297x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	232x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	301x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	132x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	159x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16